About Duffbert...

Duffbert's Random Musings is a blog where I talk about whatever happens to be running through my head at any given moment... I'm Thomas Duff, and you can find out more about me here...

Email Me!

Search This Site!

Custom Search

I'm published!

Co-author of the book IBM Lotus Sametime 8 Essentials: A User's Guide
SametimeBookCoverImage.jpg

Purchase on Amazon

Co-author of the book IBM Sametime 8.5.2 Administration Guide
SametimeAdminBookCoverImage.jpg

Purchase on Amazon

MiscLinks

Visitor Count...



View My Stats

« Book Review - Steroid Nation by Shaun Assael | Main| Blue Wave Technology Limited acquires BE Systems Limited »

Do Microsoft Business Partners even read their press releases?

Category Microsoft
This gem from Unify pushing the whole Domino-To-Microsoft conversion software...

Efficiently Migrating Lotus Notes Applications to Modern Platforms

ABSTRACT:

As businesses move into the era of highly scalable architectures, SOA, rich customer-facing applications, and mobile workforces, they are discovering that previously satisfactory workgroup and workflow systems no longer provide needed capabilities.

Lotus Notes, in particular, is quickly becoming viewed as a legacy platform that is difficult to shed as part of a move to modern, scalable, and non-proprietary architectures.

This white paper examines:

    * Options for rapidly migrating off of Lotus Notes to Microsoft's .NET platform
    * How organizations can better manage the transition
    * A solution for migration off the complex Lotus Notes applications to Microsoft's enterprise infrastructure

First off, Lotus Notes does "highly scalable architectures, SOA, rich customer-facing applications, and mobile workforces" just fine, thank you.

But what really gets me is how moving to a "modern, scalable, non-proprietary" involves *anything* to do with Microsoft!  And comparing a "complex" Lotus Notes application to Microsoft's "enterprise infrastructure" is laughable.  Have you seen how many moving parts you need to build an equivalent platform in Microsoft?  Look up "complex" in the dictionary, and you'll find Microsoft's logo...

Blatant sales hype and lies don't get much better than this one...  :)

Comments

Gravatar Image1 - What Unify will be "happy" to do is irrelevant here. The sales pitch in this piece is to migrate to non-complex, non-proprietary platforms from Notes, and they position Microsoft and .Net to be that non-complex, non-proprietary solution.

And if you can make a case for Microsoft and .Net to be both non-complex and non-proprietary, I'd be more than happy to hear you out.

Gravatar Image2 - Actually, Unify will be more than happy to create a j2ee version of your app, they now offer conversions to both java and .net.

Gravatar Image3 - I wonder if some of this is a matter of interpretation. I did not find the whitepaper you referenced to read more, but when I read the bullet: "A solution for migration off the complex Lotus Notes applications to Microsoft's enterprise infrastructure", I interpret that to mean that they offer a migration solution that includes complex Lotus Notes apps (vs. the Microsoft tools that don't address "complex" Lotus apps and seem to only be helpful if you've stamped out an application from one of the Lotus-supplied templates). I don't read that to mean they're saying .NET is somehow not complex. That would be an outrageous claim.

I think the same goes for the non-proprietary phrase as well. I agree it's a poor choice of words and "non-proprietary" certainly wouldn't apply to the Microsoft environment. What I think they're addressing here is a general desire that exists in many companies to "standardize" their enterprise development platforms and tooling. And right now, that typically involves making a choice between J2EE and .NET. I have known people that were involved in such decisions and several times Lotus wound up out in the cold, not because it wasn't functional or because people weren't able to put out good apps with it, but more or less because it doesn't fit neatly in one of the camps and therefore couldn't fall into the company's "standard".

Keep up the good work, I have enjoyed your blog through the years.

Gravatar Image4 - To be honest... a lot of auditors think Lotus Notes is overly complex. They freak out (which can be a good thing) when they hear an application is built in Notes.

I think non-techies who make decisions think Lotus Notes is way too complex.

I've been talking to a user who's Microsoft Access application has four forms but one massive table. The data structure is just plain wrong and I tried to convince her with what I could do in Notes and she just didn't get it.

Post A Comment

:-D:-o:-p:-x:-(:-):-\:angry::cool::cry::emb::grin::huh::laugh::lips::rolleyes:;-)

Want to support this blog or just say thanks?

When you shop Amazon, start your shopping experience here.

When you do that, all your purchases during that session earn me an affiliate commission via the Amazon Affiliate program. You don't have to buy the book I linked you to (although I wouldn't complain!). Simply use that as your starting point.

Thanks!

Thomas "Duffbert" Duff

Ads of Relevance...