The InformationWeek article that picked up the Radicati "report"...
Category IBM/Lotus
... is no longer out there. You click on the story and you get the equivalent of a 404 error.
Now, today I did fill out their "letter to the editor" form and strongly suggested they check out Chris Byrne's article for an alternative view of the validity of the numbers and whether they could accurately draw conclusions from them. I'd really like to think that they did just that, realized that there were some serious issues, and removed the article. The proof will be to see if they do the follow-up report that was promised in the original article. If they don't write that piece and that's the last we hear of the white paper, then my faith in technology journalism will be somewhat restored.
With the exception of Forbes, that is... :-)
... is no longer out there. You click on the story and you get the equivalent of a 404 error.
Now, today I did fill out their "letter to the editor" form and strongly suggested they check out Chris Byrne's article for an alternative view of the validity of the numbers and whether they could accurately draw conclusions from them. I'd really like to think that they did just that, realized that there were some serious issues, and removed the article. The proof will be to see if they do the follow-up report that was promised in the original article. If they don't write that piece and that's the last we hear of the white paper, then my faith in technology journalism will be somewhat restored.
With the exception of Forbes, that is... :-)



Comments
I'll do that this evening when I get home from work.
Posted by Duffbert At 07:49:15 On 26/05/2005 | - Website - |
Posted by Duffbert At 20:20:49 On 25/05/2005 | - Website - |
http://www.messagingpipeline.com/163700646 Maybe y'all could leave similar feedback there
Posted by Ed Brill At 07:25:21 On 26/05/2005 | - Website - |
Posted by Richard Schwartz At 20:51:25 On 26/05/2005 | - Website - |
Posted by Ben Langhinrichs At 20:08:58 On 25/05/2005 | - Website - |